Skip to content
Prime Poker Space offers in-depth poker strategy guides, ga…

Tetris Wouldn't Succeed at This Gaming Ceremony — An Additional Classification Might Solve This

As any significant prize-giving event draws close, one notices an outcry to include of new categories to recognize unsung work and delight the passions of fans with niche passions.

Another commentator made the case for a horror game category. That would be fantastic. Equally deserving are tabletop games, this being someone's personal cause. However, I must insist when I prioritize just as with other dedicated enthusiasts, there's a strong justification supporting my request remains most pressing above others. The demand is this: We need a classification for brain-teasing titles.

Categorizing Game Types

Organizing artistic expressions is not a science; it’s very subjective, and inevitably start arguments and end in fuzzy definitions. This explains why movie academies don’t do it. Yet it remains a necessary evil in the world of video games, that demonstrate such variety it's challenging to consider them as a single art form.

To recognize the complete range of achievement in video games to gain proper attention, and to ensure all game types to receive proper recognition, classification by type becomes crucial.

Current Gaming Award Categories

Leading game ceremonies offer these classifications covering Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these award types effectively encompass numerous genres, making space possible for numerous titles.

Different situation exists for puzzle games. No appropriate category exists to put them. Consider three of this year’s best games, showing diverse approaches: building puzzles from a specific release, the pulse-pounding block-matching from another release, thought-provoking social scenarios of a third title. Where could they possibly go within current classifications? Simply put, no category fits.

The Representation Problem

Many instances occur outstanding logic titles launched regularly lacking appropriate categories at major award shows, if they accidentally match for categories like Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the extremely competitive small studio competitions.

  • A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated completely during that awards season
  • Another imaginative release received no nominations in 2019
  • Well-received sorting experience got ignored recently
  • Only a few puzzle games barely qualified for niche award types

Value of Brain-Teasers

Commonly they're compact experiences, however the design behind logic titles carries substantial weight. Iconic mobile puzzle games rank among most engaged experiences in the world continuing this trend for over a decade.

The legendary block-stacking game challenges well-known building titles claiming status as best-selling game of all time; it additionally competes for best game of all time. Puzzle games are foundational for gaming as medium, while interacting with diverse game types.

Proposal and Rationale

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter this problem. One could readily select a field of five engaging, different, qualified experiences annually without trouble — actually, with challenge, given the need to exclude numerous deserving experiences.

To emphasize again, these include experiences without proper classification in important events. Puzzle game makers operate at the hard edge of video game design, creating some of most fundamental forms within interactive entertainment. Comparable to film action specialists, they merit acknowledgment. Don't make them wait 35 years.

Written by

Alejandro Quinn

Professional poker player and strategy analyst with over a decade of tournament experience, specializing in Texas Hold'em and Omaha variants.

Prime Poker Space

Type to search articles.